Intersecting Inequities
FEMINISM
Analyzing Economic Inequality Through Feminism
In analyzing economic inequality through the lens of feminist theory, we examined wage disparities by gender. Our analysis aimed to determine if significant gender-based economic disparities exist and to understand the underlying causes through feminist theoretical concepts.
​
​
​​​
​
​
​
​
​
The first step involved comparing the average wages of men and women across different educational levels. Our findings revealed a clear correlation between gender and average salary, with women earning significantly less than men. This disparity persists even when controlling for education, indicating that gender inequality is pervasive across all levels of educational attainment.
​
When focusing on individuals with higher education, the wage gap remains evident. High-educated women still earn less than their male counterparts, underscoring that advanced education does not shield women from economic inequality.
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
Women with lower educational levels are more likely to experience significant wage gaps, reflecting systemic biases in the labor market, and pointing to broader societal structures that perpetuate gender discrimination. According to Laura Counts, systemic biases significantly contribute to wage disparity, and simply improving negotiation skills does not address the underlying bias women face (Counts). Even highly educated women face wage disparities, reinforcing the presence of structural sexism. Despite having equivalent qualifications, women encounter barriers that men do not. Alexia Fernández Campbell highlights how wage transparency laws, which mandate employers to disclose pay ranges in job advertisements, have proven effective in reducing wage disparities. However, these measures alone cannot fully address the systemic biases women face (Campbell). The persistent wage gap among educated individuals points to structural sexism. Gender ideologies, as noted in Gaii T. Houston's work, are deeply embedded in societal institutions, necessitating comprehensive changes to achieve equity. Structural reforms in workplace policies and cultural attitudes are essential to dismantling discriminatory practices that perpetuate wage disparities (Houston 11). Furthermore, the Pew Research Center report provides a comprehensive analysis of factors contributing to the gender pay gap, including race, education, and employment sector (Parker and Horowitz). Understanding these variables is essential for developing effective policies to combat wage inequality.
​
In conclusion, our findings confirm that economic inequality based on gender remains a significant issue, rooted in structural and systemic biases. Feminist theory provides a robust framework for understanding these disparities and advocating for comprehensive policy changes. Addressing gender pay gaps requires more than individual negotiation efforts. It necessitates institutional reforms that promote transparency, fairness, and accountability in the workplace.
Analyzing Economic Inequality Through CRT
Economic inequality also exists between different races. This is a problem that has been going on for a long time historically and continues today. Critical Race Theory (CRT) provides a useful framework for studying this inequality. CRT emphasizes that racism is everyday and structural, which acts as a major factor in continuing economic disadvantages. The provided images, which aggregate data and visualize it, highlight various aspects of economic inequality by showing wage gaps, productivity growth, and differences in wage growth according to race and education levels.
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
The first image shows productivity and median wage growth by race. While productivity has increased significantly, the median wage growth for Black people is much lower than that for White people. CRT argues that this gap is the result of systematic inequality in the labor market. Despite the increase in productivity, the benefits have been disproportionately distributed to White workers. This can be linked to discriminatory labor practices such as wage suppression and limiting career advancement opportunities for minority workers. The wealth gap between races further worsens these issues.
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
Education could solve this economic inequality. However, the second image shows wage gaps according to educational levels by race. Even with the same level of education, White people earn higher wages than Black and Hispanic people. Also, there are many cases where White people with lower educational levels earn higher wages than other races. This indicates that education alone cannot resolve economic inequality. CRT explains that these gaps are the result of historical and structural discrimination. Discriminatory employment practices and unequal educational opportunities lead to these persistent gaps.
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
Such discrimination is also evident among those with higher education. The third image compares real wage growth for bachelor's degree holders. While White people have experienced high wage growth, Black people have sometimes seen a decrease in wages. CRT argues that racial biases and systematic barriers still exist for highly educated minorities. Black graduates experience discrimination in employment, promotion, and salaries. This argument is also supported by experimental research from Poverty Action. For example, a study by Poverty Action found that racial discrimination is still widespread in the U.S. labor market. This study compared the interview request rates of applicants with White names and minority names using the same resume, finding that applicants with White names were much more likely to receive interview requests. This is an important example of how racial discrimination actually works in the labor market.
​
Through data visualization, we can see the prevalence of economic inequality according to racial differences. Currently, to address this inequality, there are only short-term solutions such as seeking help from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. CRT reveals the structural and systematic factors that sustain economic inequality and emphasizes the need for policies to address these root causes. Solutions should focus not only on individual efforts but also on dismantling institutional barriers that hinder economic equity.
Analyzing Economic Inequality Through the Marxist Lens
​
From a Marxist perspective, education serves as a mechanism to perpetuate class structures within a capitalist society. Analyzing the dataset from Kaggle, particularly "Wages by Education in the USA," reveals how higher education correlates with higher wages. However, these benefits are not equally distributed among all socioeconomic groups.
​
Data Analysis: The data shows that individuals with higher education levels, such as those with bachelor's or advanced degrees, experience significantly higher wages. For instance, the average wage for individuals with a bachelor's degree is substantially higher than for those without a high school diploma. This disparity highlights systemic barriers that limit access to higher education for those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, perpetuating existing economic inequalities.
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
Economic Disparities: The datasets indicate that while education can provide upward economic mobility, those starting with fewer resources remain disadvantaged. Families with college graduates tend to experience better economic outcomes over time, as evidenced by the PPIC findings that suggest significant income increases for households with higher education levels. However, those without access to such education see stagnant or declining incomes, which reinforces economic inequality.
​
Labor Market Dynamics: The data further reveals that the labor market rewards higher education with better-paying jobs, but these rewards are not equally accessible to everyone. Financial constraints and systemic inequalities create significant challenges for individuals from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, preventing them from achieving the same economic outcomes as their peers from more privileged backgrounds. This dynamic is critical in understanding how education, while beneficial, also perpetuates existing inequalities.
​
Ideological Control: Michael W. Apple, in Ideology and Curriculum, argues that educational curricula are designed to reflect and reinforce the interests of the ruling class. By embedding dominant ideologies within the education system, students are conditioned to accept and perpetuate the existing social order, fulfilling labor market demands in ways that sustain social stratification and inequality.
Reinforcing Inequality: ReviseSociology (2023) elaborates that Marxist theory views education as a tool to maintain capitalist inequalities. Through the dissemination of ruling class ideologies, education creates compliant workers and legitimizes social inequalities via hidden curricula that instill values like discipline, obedience, and competition, aligning with capitalist economic needs and protecting the ruling class's interests.
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
The graph supports the findings of the Public Policy Institute of California (2021) that higher education can offer significant employment value and economic mobility. However, the systemic barriers to attaining such education mean that economic mobility remains limited for many, predominantly serving to reproduce existing class inequalities.
​
In conclusion, the Marxist analysis of the Kaggle datasets suggests that education, as it currently operates, serves more to maintain class structures than to dismantle them. To achieve true economic equality, systemic reforms are necessary that go beyond simply improving access to education. These reforms must address the underlying economic and social inequalities that education alone cannot overcome.
Our analysis of economic inequality through the lenses of feminism, race theory, and Marxism highlights the multifaceted nature of wage disparities. Despite significant advancements in societal awareness and policy interventions, wage gaps across gender, race, and class persist, underscoring the deep-seated structural issues that maintain these inequalities. Each theoretical framework provides unique insights into the systemic barriers that perpetuate these disparities, emphasizing the need for comprehensive policy reforms.
Future Directions and Limitations:
While our data analysis provides valuable insights, it is not without limitations. The datasets used may not capture all dimensions of economic inequality, such as intersectional identities and regional variations. Additionally, our analysis primarily focuses on wage data, potentially overlooking other forms of economic disparity like wealth gaps and employment rates. Future research should incorporate a broader range of data sources and consider longitudinal studies to better understand the long-term impacts of systemic inequalities on economic outcomes.
​
In conclusion, addressing economic inequality requires a multifaceted approach that considers gender, race, and class. Feminism, race theory, and Marxism each offer crucial perspectives that illuminate the structural barriers maintaining wage disparities. By implementing policies that promote fairness, transparency, and inclusivity, we can move towards a more equitable society where all individuals, regardless of gender, race, or class, have the opportunity to succeed.
Policy Recommendations
-
Enforcing Pay Transparency: Implementing laws that require companies to disclose salary ranges for positions can help reduce wage disparities and promote fairness.
-
Implementation of Anonymous Evaluation System: Exclude personal identification information such as name, race, and gender within the company, and evaluate purely based on job performance and contributions.
-
Expanding Access to Quality Education: Increasing funding for public schools, offering more scholarships, and reducing barriers to higher education can help level the playing field, thus addressing class-based disparities.
-
Implementing Family-Friendly Policies: Providing paid family leave, affordable childcare, and flexible working arrangements can support workers, particularly women, in balancing career and family responsibilities.
-
Promoting Inclusive Workplaces: Encouraging diversity and inclusion initiatives, providing training on unconscious bias, and supporting minority employees' career development can foster more equitable workplaces.